Fun with analogies
President Bush acknowledged growing international pressure for an immediate Middle East cease-fire Monday but dismissed any idea of simply “stopping for the sake of stopping” without a plan for lasting peace.
Now this, is pure bullshit. How about we stop for the sake of human life you dolt?
Let me preface my argument by saying I understand Israel has a full legitimate right to defend itself against attacks on its own civilian population. I take no exception to that. But since schoolyard analogies of bullies and whatnot are so common when pundits discuss the Middle East, I want to try one on.
Let's say a rogue 1st grader quietly steals money from the teacher's purse while everyone is out at recess. To make it a closer parallel to current affairs, let's also say that this has happened numerous times in the past. Every time it goes the same: the teacher confronts the entire class, no one steps forward.
This time the teacher has had enough. So she implements a new policy towards the entire class. Every student will be beaten with paddle 10 times whenever the money comes up missing, until all of the classmates renounce the thief in their midst and the thief steps forward to be punished.
This puts the question to you then, as a theoretical parent. Would you support the teacher's new Get-Tough policy towards the thief and those who harbor him/her?
Again, I know Israel needs to defend itself. I'm just saying that you can defend yourself without punishing everyone in the general geographic proximity of the extremist group you are trying to marginalize and defeat. Because given the choice, I bet the relatives and neighbors of those 67 dead Lebonese are now going to side with Hezbollah rather than the American bombs and Israeli planes dropping them in the name of Freedom.
Fight terrorists. Just quit being such fucking idiots about it.


